|
|
Multi-storey building
Jetonický, Pavel ; Puchner, Josef (referee) ; Sýkora, Karel (advisor)
The subject of the master´s thesis is the design and assessment of the static load-bearing steel structure office building. It is an eight-storey building with a floor plan and dimensions 54x15m. The proposal has three variants. In one of them a steel frame with a hinge attached elements. These are the pillars, beams, trusses, joists and purlins, which are coupled with trapeze plate and thereby secure the stability of the position in the horizontal direction. The steel structure is placed between the reinforced concrete towers.
|
|
|
Multi-storey building
Cmajdálková, Alžběta ; Bajer, Miroslav (referee) ; Sýkora, Karel (advisor)
The subject of the master’s thesis is static design and assessment of the static load-bearing steel structure. The structure is designed for the site Brno. Specifically this is an eight-storey office building with a 54 x 12 m floor plan and a total height is 30,2 m. The steel structure is lovated betwrrn teo reinforced concrete towers secure for vertical transport. The structure is designed in three variants. In the one of them a steel frame with hingee attached elements. The ceiling structure is designed as composite steel and concrete structure.
|
|
|
Information Centre
Kovář, Jindřich ; Štrba,, Michal (referee) ; Barnat, Jan (advisor)
This bachelor thesis is concerned with the static project and the consideration of the carrier steel construction of the information centre that means the two-storeyed building with the 24 x 24m extent. The project is solved by two options. In both cases, the steel basis with components united by articulated joints is concerned. These are pillars, supporting joists and ceiling beams that are composited with a concrete desk so that they ensure the position stability in a horizontal direction. The both options differ from each other by the position stability method in a vertical direction. In the first case, the vertical clamps avoid the deformation. In the second case, two frame constructions are designed for both yawing directions. The result was the choice of the first method that is discussed in a more detailed way further.
|
|
|
Multi-storey building
Cmajdálková, Alžběta ; Bajer, Miroslav (referee) ; Sýkora, Karel (advisor)
The subject of the master’s thesis is static design and assessment of the static load-bearing steel structure. The structure is designed for the site Brno. Specifically this is an eight-storey office building with a 54 x 12 m floor plan and a total height is 30,2 m. The steel structure is lovated betwrrn teo reinforced concrete towers secure for vertical transport. The structure is designed in three variants. In the one of them a steel frame with hingee attached elements. The ceiling structure is designed as composite steel and concrete structure.
|
|
|
Multi-storey building
Jetonický, Pavel ; Puchner, Josef (referee) ; Sýkora, Karel (advisor)
The subject of the master´s thesis is the design and assessment of the static load-bearing steel structure office building. It is an eight-storey building with a floor plan and dimensions 54x15m. The proposal has three variants. In one of them a steel frame with a hinge attached elements. These are the pillars, beams, trusses, joists and purlins, which are coupled with trapeze plate and thereby secure the stability of the position in the horizontal direction. The steel structure is placed between the reinforced concrete towers.
|
|
|
Information Centre
Kovář, Jindřich ; Štrba,, Michal (referee) ; Barnat, Jan (advisor)
This bachelor thesis is concerned with the static project and the consideration of the carrier steel construction of the information centre that means the two-storeyed building with the 24 x 24m extent. The project is solved by two options. In both cases, the steel basis with components united by articulated joints is concerned. These are pillars, supporting joists and ceiling beams that are composited with a concrete desk so that they ensure the position stability in a horizontal direction. The both options differ from each other by the position stability method in a vertical direction. In the first case, the vertical clamps avoid the deformation. In the second case, two frame constructions are designed for both yawing directions. The result was the choice of the first method that is discussed in a more detailed way further.
|
guest ::
